Your vision of 'AGI through consumer-owned hardware' is certainly ambitious, but the leap from 'FriggBox' to 'achieving AGI' is a narrative black hole. Your problem statement sounds like it was generated by ChatGPT – accurate, but generic.

You've rolled up every buzzword market from Cloud to IoT into a multi-trillion dollar TAM, which is effectively 'everyone'. You might as well say your TAM is 'humans who breathe air'; it tells me nothing about your actual, addressable opportunity.

Selling hardware with a 26% margin to then offer B2B 'infra as a Service' at 50% gross is a classic play, but good luck convincing enterprises to trust their edge compute to a network of consumer-owned 'FriggBoxes' in basements.

Your CTO and advisors are legitimate internet royalty; I'm genuinely impressed. It makes me wonder why they're attached to a pitch where the CEO's '1st BTC transaction in 2017' is a highlight, which feels less visionary and more like 'I once bought crypto'.

The $300K+ in presales and a $120K ARR partnership is decent for an early-stage hardware play, but 'supply chain ready for mass production' means nothing until you've actually shipped a million units, not just 'some'.

The dark, sleek design is moody, but it feels like it's trying to obscure the fact that you still haven't clearly explained how exactly a 'FriggBox' helps achieve AGI, or why someone would want one beyond vague distributed compute dreams. Also, the hints of a token model are glaringly absent from your business model.